Healthcare providers, payers, exchanges, and many service providers to the healthcare industry are under increased pressure to demonstrate their compliance with the security and privacy requirements of HIPAA.
Information security is a hot topic and receives frequent headlines due to the weekly—if not daily—security breaches that occur on a global scale. At Linford & Co, we work with service providers on a regular basis to evaluate aspects of their information security by independently testing the design and operating effectiveness of their controls.
One of the areas we are required to evaluate on every HIPAA audit or compliance assessment is whether our client is compliant with HIPAA’s record retention requirements.
Recently, a client asked if we could provide them some insight on the similarities, differences, advantages, and disadvantages of getting a SOC 2 Security versus an ISO 27001 certification.
Obtaining a SOC 2 report requires an investment of both time and money for a service organization and, at some point, might seem like more work than it’s worth. However, the advantages to obtaining a SOC 2 report far outweigh the initial investment.
Recently, we have noticed that clients of service organizations are asking for a “SOC” report in general, and not necessarily specifying which type of report they are looking for [i.e., SOC 1 (f. SSAE 16), SOC 2, or SOC 3].
Some of our clients occasionally ask us when it is a good idea to get a SOC 3 report. The answer for most companies is that a SOC 3 is not necessary.
Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (the “ACA”), health insurance marketplaces have been set up to facilitate the purchase of health insurance in each state.
On December 15, 2014, the new SOC 2 Common Criteria took effect. What does that mean for your SOC 2 audit?
The ever-growing emphasis on governance, risk management, and compliance has driven companies to focus on internal controls over all aspects of their operations.